Okay with in the last two weeks, just about every other post has dealt with either the Xbox 360 or Sony's DRM software. I was going to do another week in review but decided to put in my two cents on the issues. So let's start off with the new Xbox.
This shiny little box will cost you a pretty penny with all of the options, during its initial weeks, but speculations about supply shortages has generated a lot of additional buzz about the new platform and at least seems to have created a large demand for a next-generation console that only a few months ago only a small few were truly exited about. Now I know all about the specs and how everything will have the ability to look that much better, especially in HD; but the bottom line is that the game developers are the only ones who should really care about these new next-generation platforms, yes it's nice to have a potentially cheap new multi-processor computer, but this is a gaming platform. So why should game developers be pretty much the only ones who care about the console specifications? Well simply put their making the games, hence they have direct control over how well it runs and looks on these new consoles. so why anyone makes a big deal about the hardware just seems dumb to me. Okay on that note, these consoles, at least in the case of the Xbox, are hoping to become more home media machines, meaning it can stream media content from your computer and other things, in general its a great idea and was one of the main reasons to mod the original xbox. The problem is their not quite their yet, why? Not enough people use their xbox's as a media device, this is where Microsoft can really gain some ground, but we'll have to wait and see. The main thing that will prove the new Xbox 360's success is games, just like every other console out there if the good games aren't on xbox no one is gonna care about it even if they can't get one.
Now for the Sony topic which quite frankly I'm tired of reading about, but would like to comment on. Yes, what they did was wrong in almost every way. Now let me clarify that statement, there is nothing wrong with protecting one's own content, what is wrong is using poorly designed software to protect it. Don't think so? If you release software to the public, in a final release, you should be accountable if it creates vulnerabilities and can do harm to another computer system other companies do; especially if that piece of software damages systems when you try to remove it, the "rootkit" software released to the public by Sony contained such software that has potentially compromised many systems. So what did they do? Well after a lot of media attention, they've started to fix the problem by re-calling CD's and to some degree apologize for their actions. I for one really hope Sony, learns from this and starts to be more consumer friendly and starts producing better products that don't compromise the consumers trust. The sad thing is that the damage has been done and it doesn't seem like Sony has learned anything from this except to not get caught next time or have a better way to contain the situation. In the end this has tarnished Sony's image but probably not for long, since most people aren't really concerned with things like "rootkits" unless it breaks something their currently using. Which is a shame since Sony really needs to be held accountable for their actions.